Is Time Real or Relative – Relative

Adam Dorado's image for:
"Is Time Real or Relative - Relative"
Image by: 

If time was a real then it would be a prime number in a supersetted malformation in the context of super-semmetrical preclusions. The temporal inclusion we have come to hate is correct and wrong at the same time, but since the real primes are skewed to the left as we say by about 2% then we can appropiate the subsets that control the super-semmetrical dispersion and their rates of decay into the Neoclidean Time Loop and their sub-matrices as exclusionary also. I have quartral mathematically precluded this function and included it too.

The use of inclusion in Euclidean Theory states that one may not allow the Time differentiators known as Time Exclusion Theory the transferrance of time dilution. Time dilution is not the purvey of delusion but is related since all things decay into N-Space/Time since if they didn't we cannot rephase throught the spectrum but simple be one atom at a time which is arguable since one atom is thought be connected by Mounic axions but if this were the case then axionic forces could not preclude the exclusions nor the inclusions nor the proclusions of both.

The arguments have been defined as the reckoning through diplaced musing not dislocated since they are the formation of matter in the time dilution theory and not the other way around. IF it were the time Preclusion as supposed we cannot form Gluonic-SubGenetive processes in our biology labs which happens daily. We are not allowed to diperse informatiomn into one catagory of science and say the others do not apply in the same exact manner since we all are the product if three junctions in time dilution theory as opposes to vionics which states that all matter is the functions of axial forces in binary mode. Does space preclude the third function of width or are we paper thin like film. So have said that and think it is to impossible for anything to be two-dimensional and not three-dimensional. So if life is three-dimensional we can say that tri-unionic junctions must be formed in three-dimensional space as a matter of self-evidence. This may seem specious but the fact is if we are 2-d then we don't exist ever since the 2-d space is given to faulty quatrical delusions known as Hempfler-Robertson-Cohlmann interference which is produced when things become 3-d since they have multi-plexed vectors as we all know.

The final argument that light and time are relatives to each other is the processes of the relativism of E=MC^2 which is true if the axial forces are in fact 3.14156. This must be true since it fits all derivatives down to the sub-matrical quanta packets and jacketed atomic tunnels of the relativistic down-cycled interference wave-fronts known as the Giant Sets in Harmonic Divergance and Proclusion in Euclidean Time-Space Theory.

The final argument is true but we see this break dow at levels of extremely high energy called Masars not Quasars since Quantum Fluxture is not evident in extremely high energy sequences in Giant Sets, though if they are giant sets then they are also Giant Steps in the processional wobble and side-contrained fluxture of atomic scalars and theorized to proceed into N space and N - Space/Time since they are reducted into the quatrices of the subgenetive processes.

The extremely difficult manuevour is to parse the packets of light and the packets of quanta which seem to be different and have there own persivities and functions and also have thier own tendencies to wobble in step-functions in axionic junctures in temporal INEXEPREPRO-Clusion we call Time Proclusivity and it's minutia.

The bragging rights of all poeple we believe is that we are all connected somewhere in the grea beyond we call the wonder level since it's not a Onclave but a whole nutha' level of existence we surmise to be Hyper-Fluidic-Sub-Infinituum-Osperages. We may not calculate this nor it's minutia if we don't know what it is nor the functionaries of it's matter-energy-force-quanta-beliefs of the Chakra that is Nirvana. Everything yet nothing in the same breath?

This canot be our final destination we suppose but many permutations of the matter which is not top-down or bottom-up but side to side then up we called the SubGenetive ONclusion.
Thank You for reading this, have a nice day.

GNU applies if you use it for private means then by all means do yet do not modify this from original format since this is violating the public venue that we all love. You may redact this but always publish the source. Thank You.

More about this author: Adam Dorado

From Around the Web